Inference FinOps Desk

Score LLM inference cost, routing, and GPU waste — then export a 90-day cut plan.

SimFictional data
4Demo roles
0Prod systems

Sign in

Accounts are provisioned by an administrator. No self-registration.

Invalid email or password. Try a demo account below.
Email
Password
Verifying credentials…

Prototype accounts — click to fill and sign in

Session expiring

You've been idle. For security this session ends automatically in 15s.

Sign out?

Unsaved filter selections will be cleared. You'll return to the sign-in screen.

Spend Profile
Score: — Loading
??
Switch role (demo)
Welcome to the Inference Cost Desk

Score routing, cache, GPU waste, and token unit economics. You leave with a cut plan, not a slide.

Company Profile
Company Name
Industry
Company Size
Monthly inference spend
What you leave with
Cost score (1–5)
Routing, cache/batch, GPU pool, unit economics.
Peer unit cost
$ / 1M tokens vs same-industry desks.
Waste map
Where tokens, GPUs, and retries burn cash.
90-day cut plan
Ranked moves with estimated monthly save.
Routing — model choice per request
2 questions
RoutingStep 1 of 4
1. How do you choose a model for each request?
2. What happens on retries and timeouts?
Cache & batch — token waste
2 questions
Cache & batchStep 2 of 4
6. Prompt / KV cache hit rate on production traffic?
7. Do you batch or coalesce non-interactive jobs?
GPU pool — idle and oversize
2 questions
GPU poolStep 3 of 4
11. How is GPU / reserved capacity utilized?
12. Do you track $ per 1M tokens by product?
Unit economics — who owns the bill
1 question
Unit economicsStep 4 of 4
16. Who can stop a spend spike?
Cost score — Acme Technologies
Routing
3.2
Cache & batch
3.8
GPU pool
3.5
Unit economics
3.0
5-level cost desk
3.4
1
Blind
Invoice shock
2
Watching
Spreadsheet
3
Routing
Some waste cut
4
Chargeback
Owners feel $
5
Hard cap
Unit cost SLO
Industry Peer Benchmarks — Financial Services
Your Score
3.4
Peer Median
3.1
Top Quartile
4.2
Your Percentile
62nd
DimensionYour ScorePeer MedianTop QuartileGap to Top
Routing3.23.04.1-0.9
Cache & batch3.83.24.4-0.6
GPU pool3.53.04.2-0.7
Unit economics3.02.84.0-1.0 (largest gap)
Gap Analysis — Top Priority Improvements
GapDimensionImpactEffortROI ScorePriority
Hard spend cap + route freezeUnit economicsHighLow9.2#1
Learned router off frontier for 40% of callsRoutingHighMedium8.4#2
Kill idle reserved GPUs nights/weekendsGPU poolMediumMedium7.1#3
Semantic cache SLO to 55% hitCache & batchMediumLow7.8#4
Move reports to batch APICache & batchMediumHigh5.4#5
Personalized 90-Day Roadmap
Days 1-14 — Cut waste
1. Freeze the top spend route. 2. Move night jobs off online. 3. Turn on prefix + semantic cache measurement.
Days 15-45 — Route cheaper
4. Task-class router (cheap / mid / frontier). 5. Chargeback $ / 1M tokens to product owners.
Days 46-75 — Right-size GPU
6. Kill idle reserved capacity. 7. Prefill/decode split on the two heaviest endpoints.
Days 76-90 — Hard cap
8. Board pack: unit cost vs peers. 9. Target Level 4 chargeback. 10. Re-score in 90 days.
Expected Score Gain
+0.6
3.4 → 4.0 in 90d
Estimated ROI
$480K
Based on peer outcomes
Target Percentile
Top 25%
Export & Share Your Report
Report Preview
Company
Acme Technologies
Overall Score
3.4 / 5.0
Percentile
62nd (Industry: Financial Services)
Top Priority
Hard spend cap + route freeze
90d ROI Potential
$480K
Export Options