Wattage InferenceWattage · inference desk · Sep 2026

FinOps desk

Wattage Inference

GPU waste and routing score. Export is a 90-day cut plan, not a screenshot.

USDper 1M tok
GPUwaste
90dplan

Sign in

Accounts are created by an administrator. There is no self-registration.

Invalid email or password. Try a demo account below.
Email
Password
Verifying credentials…

Prototype accounts — click to fill

Session expiring

You've been idle. For security this session ends automatically in 2:00.

Sign out?

Unsaved filter selections will be cleared. You'll return to the sign-in screen.

Spend Profile
Score: — Loading
??
Switch role (demo)
Welcome to the Inference Cost Desk

Score routing, cache, GPU waste, and token unit economics. You leave with a cut plan, not a slide.

Company Profile
Company Name
Industry
Company Size
Monthly inference spend
What you leave with
Cost score (1–5)
Routing, cache/batch, GPU pool, unit economics.
Peer unit cost
$ / 1M tokens vs same-industry desks.
Waste map
Where tokens, GPUs, and retries burn cash.
90-day cut plan
Ranked moves with estimated monthly save.
Routing — model choice per request
2 questions
RoutingStep 1 of 4
1. How do you choose a model for each request?
2. What happens on retries and timeouts?
Cache & batch — token waste
2 questions
Cache & batchStep 2 of 4
6. Prompt / KV cache hit rate on production traffic?
7. Do you batch or coalesce non-interactive jobs?
GPU pool — idle and oversize
2 questions
GPU poolStep 3 of 4
11. How is GPU / reserved capacity utilized?
12. Do you track $ per 1M tokens by product?
Unit economics — who owns the bill
1 question
Unit economicsStep 4 of 4
16. Who can stop a spend spike?
Cost score — Acme Technologies
Routing
3.2
Cache & batch
3.8
GPU pool
3.5
Unit economics
3.0
5-level cost desk
3.4
1
Blind
Invoice shock
2
Watching
Spreadsheet
3
Routing
Some waste cut
4
Chargeback
Owners feel $
5
Hard cap
Unit cost SLO
Industry Peer Benchmarks — Financial Services
Your Score
3.4
Peer Median
3.1
Top Quartile
4.2
Your Percentile
62nd
DimensionYour ScorePeer MedianTop QuartileGap to Top
Routing3.23.04.1-0.9
Cache & batch3.83.24.4-0.6
GPU pool3.53.04.2-0.7
Unit economics3.02.84.0-1.0 (largest gap)
Gap Analysis — Top Priority Improvements
GapDimensionImpactEffortROI ScorePriority
Hard spend cap + route freezeUnit economicsHighLow9.2#1
Learned router off frontier for 40% of callsRoutingHighMedium8.4#2
Kill idle reserved GPUs nights/weekendsGPU poolMediumMedium7.1#3
Semantic cache SLO to 55% hitCache & batchMediumLow7.8#4
Move reports to batch APICache & batchMediumHigh5.4#5
Personalized 90-Day Roadmap
Days 1-14 — Cut waste
1. Freeze the top spend route. 2. Move night jobs off online. 3. Turn on prefix + semantic cache measurement.
Days 15-45 — Route cheaper
4. Task-class router (cheap / mid / frontier). 5. Chargeback $ / 1M tokens to product owners.
Days 46-75 — Right-size GPU
6. Kill idle reserved capacity. 7. Prefill/decode split on the two heaviest endpoints.
Days 76-90 — Hard cap
8. Board pack: unit cost vs peers. 9. Target Level 4 chargeback. 10. Re-score in 90 days.
Expected Score Gain
+0.6
3.4 → 4.0 in 90d
Estimated ROI
$480K
Based on peer outcomes
Target Percentile
Top 25%
Export & Share Your Report
Report Preview
Company
Acme Technologies
Overall Score
3.4 / 5.0
Percentile
62nd (Industry: Financial Services)
Top Priority
Hard spend cap + route freeze
90d ROI Potential
$480K
Export Options